Featured Post

NEWS: To what extent are Africa's megacities equipped and prepared to cope with the impacts of climate change?

Posted by on
The health repercussions of climate change in African cities require immediate attention. These urban areas find themselves on the front lines, facing rising temperatures and worsening air pollution. To safeguard both people and the environment, governments must act decisively. They must channel investments into green infrastructure, champion clean energy initiatives, and bolster healthcare systems. African cities face substantial health challenges due to climate change, including flood risks, droughts, and the spread of vector-borne diseases. Droughts are a significant cause of mortality globally and are indirectly linked to extreme heat. Indirect health issues arise through food-borne and vector-borne diseases, non-communicable illnesses, displacement, and mental health stressors. Air pollution intensifies with fossil fuel combustion, contributing to over 5 million deaths annually. African cities have responded by implementing policies to minimize resource consumption and reduce gree
0

NEWS: How do we re-center infrastructure conversations around needs, outcomes, and services rather than projects or assets?

Posted by on



No one needs a highway—they need to get to work or school.

Are we having the right infrastructure conversations with communities around their needs and priorities?

Are we talking about infrastructure the right way?

One might see the infrastructure gap projection and ask "How can we close the gap?" But Norman Anderson, chairman and CEO of CG/LA Infrastructure, sees a different problem that goes far deeper than funding. He believes the tendency to focus more on individual systems, such as bridges, roads and airports, than the people who use them, is a fundamental flaw in the way we talk about infrastructure. In a 2017 survey by IPSOS, 37% of 1,500 Brazilian respondents said they view "health" as the priority of infrastructure investment, while 36% thought of mobility. Only 4% identified physical assets. 

Anderson says this illustrates that "normal people" are more focused on the benefits of infrastructure than the infrastructure itself. He is not alone in his assessment. In December, the Brookings Institution published a two-part analysis that, among many things, stresses the need to reshape the discourse around US infrastructure needs and investments. 

The report states: “Our national infrastructure discussions are largely fragmented by sector and federal budget categories. Taking a place-based and people-first approach will require an overhaul of how we engage communities around local infrastructure needs and priorities. No one needs a highway—they need to get to work or school. Re-centering conversations around needs, outcomes, and services rather than projects or assets—especially in this time of rapidly changing needs—is an essential first step.”

One of those evolving needs is transit, which endured a plethora of funding woes in 2020 as ridership plummeted during the coronavirus pandemic. Anderson believes many people still see public transportation as unsafe, despite research that suggests otherwise. 

But if public transit is really as unsafe as the public thinks, why did voters across the US approve many major public transit measures on ballots in November? Paul Skoutelas, president and CEO of the American Public Transportation Association, said the outcome of the ballot measures represents a forward-thinking populace that sees saving public transit as critical to the environment and societal equity. 

The incoming Biden administration is also expected to approach infrastructure with an eye toward sustainability and equity. A recent white paper from Bloomberg Intelligence concludes the administration could lay the foundation for a revolution in rail infrastructure. The analysis 

also acknowledges that many workers lack access to low-emission options for affordable, reliable public transportation, and notes the Biden administration “intends to allocate flexible federal investments with strong labor protection to help cities and towns install light-rail networks and improve existing transit and bus lines. Biden will also push investment in infrastructure for pedestrians, cyclists, and e-scooters and other micro-mobility vehicles.” 

A successful deployment of that strategy would put the US in line with the UN’s “people-first” model for public-private infrastructure projects. The model, published in 2016, evaluates projects on five criteria: 
  • Increasing access and promoting equity
  • Improving environmental sustainability
  • Improving project economic effectiveness
  • Ensuring replicability
  • Engaging all stakeholders
But ultimately, according to Anderson, it all comes down to whether the US can reconcile the different needs of all stakeholders -- builders, financers and politicians -- that oversee infrastructure development, and come to a consensus on the purpose of what they're doing.

“If I'm going to make investments that are 3% to 4% of GDP for 10 years, and those results are going to last for the next 40 or 50 years, and I'm going to be paying for those assets ... what am I going to get?” Anderson asks. “And this weird answer of silence or a better highway, or buses that are cleaner -- What does that even mean?” 

Source: Smartbrief

If you would like to receive email alerts when Hardhat Career Tips articles are published submit your details here

If you only like to receive Hardhat Career Tips images submit your details here

Comments

Post a Comment