Featured Post

NEWS: To what extent are Africa's megacities equipped and prepared to cope with the impacts of climate change?

The health repercussions of climate change in African cities require immediate attention. These urban areas find themselves on the front lines, facing rising temperatures and worsening air pollution. To safeguard both people and the environment, governments must act decisively. They must channel investments into green infrastructure, champion clean energy initiatives, and bolster healthcare systems. African cities face substantial health challenges due to climate change, including flood risks, droughts, and the spread of vector-borne diseases. Droughts are a significant cause of mortality globally and are indirectly linked to extreme heat. Indirect health issues arise through food-borne and vector-borne diseases, non-communicable illnesses, displacement, and mental health stressors. Air pollution intensifies with fossil fuel combustion, contributing to over 5 million deaths annually. African cities have responded by implementing policies to minimize resource consumption and reduce gree

Will the Government infrastructure drive address the history of underspending?


Stats SA says the general fall by Government on infrastructure investment mirrors the long-term stagnation in the construction industry.

Will the government announced roll-out of an extensive infrastructure investment drive address a history of chronic infrastructure underspending?

Data shows how government is falling behind on infrastructure – neglecting roads, schools and maintenance



New data published by Statistics South Africa shows a steady decline in infrastructure spending from the government over the last year.

In June 2020, the government announced the roll-out of an extensive infrastructure investment drive that would cover 55 projects across six sectors. The programme is an attempt to kick-start an economy battered by Covid-19, as well as to address a history of chronic infrastructure underspending.

Stats SA’s data shows that delays and interruptions hampered infrastructure spending by provincial government during the 2018/19 fiscal year. This mainly affected the construction of schools, as well as the rehabilitation and maintenance of road infrastructure.

South Africa’s 123 provincial government departments recorded a decrease in infrastructure spending – referred to as capital expenditure – of R1.88 billion in 2018/19. This represents a fall of 5.4% compared with 2017/18.

Capital expenditure is money that institutions spend to buy, upgrade and maintain fixed assets such as buildings, vehicles, equipment, and land. North West, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo and Gauteng recorded the biggest decreases,Stats SA said.

The general fall in infrastructure investment mirrors the long-term stagnation in the construction industry, Stats SA said. Construction experienced its eighth consecutive quarter of economic decline in the second quarter of 2020, according to the latest gross domestic product (GDP) figures.

“Infrastructure development is important. Economic infrastructure (e.g. electricity and water supply, transport, communications) and social infrastructure (e.g. schools, universities, hospitals) provide a foundation for economic and social activity,” the statistics body said.

“Infrastructure development is one of many dimensions to achieving sustainable growth in GDP and, accordingly, expanding the labour market; provided that it’s directed towards areas of greatest need. The statistics on infrastructure investment will continue to attract much interest and attention.”

Stats SA outlined some of the more egregious issues below:

North West – The North West provincial government recorded a fall of R486 million in capital expenditure. The North West Department of Education was the most significant contributor to this decrease, recording a cut of R398 million on the construction of school buildings and other fixed structures. The slow implementation of projects in North West was the reason behind the fall in spending, according to the department’s annual report.

KZN – KZN’s decline was mainly due to underspending on road infrastructure. The provincial Department of Transport was the main contributor to the R458 million fall, decreasing its own capital spending by R387 million. The transport department stated in its annual report that this was due to a number of reasons, including a delay in finalising the department’s participation in a road contract based in eThekwini. There was also a setback in the awarding of a large road rehabilitation tender. The department was flooded with a high volume of bids for the tender, slowing down the evaluation process and resulting in payment delays.

Limpopo – Limpopo provincial government recorded a decline of R447 million, largely the result of the provincial Department of Education spending less on infrastructure projects. There were delays in the construction and completion of new schools, according to the department’s annual report. Various projects were also reprioritised, causing delays in the allocation of new maintenance and service delivery work to contractors.

Gauteng – The decline in capital expenditure in Gauteng was also driven largely by a fall in education spending. The province recorded a decline in the construction of new school buildings and renovations. The provincial Department of Education stated in its annual report that the underspending was caused by underperforming contractors, community disruptions, bad weather conditions and delays brought on by service providers. Provincial government is not the only sector that has cut back on capital expenditure. Data covering the entire public sector shows an 8,2% fall in infrastructure investment in 2018. This was on the back of a 4,0% decline in 2017. With these decreases, public-sector capital spending slipped to a level last seen in 2014.

Source: BusinessTech

Comments