The construction mafia's demand for a 30% share of project contracts is a clear distortion of the PPPFA's well-intentioned goals. Furthermore, these groups often blur the lines between public and private procurement, extending their illegal activities into private sector projects. Winning tenders also presents challenges due to Regulation 9, which requires selecting suppliers from a state-provided list, a list that typically excludes construction mafia groups. Companies facing these challenges do have options. They can collaborate with law enforcement agencies through dedicated forums or engage with industry bodies to address these issues collectively. The full article can be read on INFRASTRUCTURE NEWS follow our Whatsapp channel here for more hardhatREVIEWS.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Contractor's as well as sub-contractor's need to understand why retention is required by the other contracting party, and more importantly, they need to understand when they are entitled to receive the retention back.
ReplyDeleteAll very good and valid points, thank you.
DeleteRetention is often abuse these days and it is generally subcontractors who are at risk of not receiving their hard-earned monies at the end of the project including all or part of their retention. Even more prevalent is when the main contractor gets liquidated or goes into business rescue. It is far safer to opt for construction guarantees
DeleteA very well made point thank you. I agree with your comment however I have come across various instances where my subbies are unfortunately not in a position to obtain a construction guarantee. In addition, should the contract specifically require retention alternatively a rention guarantee - the subbie is sadly not able to dictate the terms of the agreement.
Delete